Today’s news is reporting that Sarah Palin is proclaiming that she is a ”not a quitter.  I am a fighter.”   Reading this in light of her having just quit as governor of Alaska brought a number of cultural touchstones to mind.  I was reminded, of course, of Alice in Wonderland.  Also springing to mind was Richard Nixon, who famously told David Frost that “when the President does it, that means it is not illegal.”  George Orwell’s criticisms of the abuse of language in “Politics and the English Language” and 1984 also sprang to mind.  And in Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes recognized that the ability of words to take on various meanings is itself a source of civil unrest, and so he sought to stabilize meanings through a positivist lexicon that would denude words of their power to incite action and violence.  But to associate Sarah Palin with the likes of Hobbes, Orwell, and even Nixon seems a bit much. Aren’t there some more apt cultural precursors to invoke? Why yes, there are.  My favorite lens through which to view Ms. Palin’s insistence that she’s actually a fighter, even though it appears that she’s just a quitter, is a verse in the Ballad of Brave Sir Robin from Monty Python and the Holy Grail.  Here, with thanks to GuntherAnderson.com, are the words:  

Brave Sir Robin ran away – No!
Bravely ran away, away – I didn’t!
When danger reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled – No!
Yes, brave Sir Robin turned about
And gallantly he chickened out
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat
Bravest of the brave, Sir Robin

P.S. Sarah: If you want to sue me, e-mail me and I’ll send you the address for your process server.

Tags: , ,

Ironies

Today (June 11), the Associated Press reported that President Obama’s former minister blamed “[t]hem Jews” for preventing the President from speaking with him. In an interview, the Reverend [I use the term loosely] Jeremiah Wright said, “Them Jews ain’t going to let him talk to me.”  Here’s a link to the article. The AP, however, omitted some other choice remarks that Reverend Wright managed to squeeze into the one minute forty-five second interview.

Wright went on to say, “the Jewish vote — the AIPAC vote — is controlling [Obama]; it will not let him send a representation to [the] Darfur review conference . . . . They will not let him talk to somebody who calls a spade what it is.”  You can hear the interview in the entirety of its loveliness here.

Reverend Wright’s comments are, shall we say, unfortunate.  Quite apart from Reverend Wright’s portrayal of the President as his staff’s, and the “Jewish” vote’s, poodle, to be leashed or let out as they please, Wright’s timing could not be worse.

The report of his statements comes a day after a White supremacist, James von Brunn, shot and killed a guard, Stephen T.  Johns, who was African- American, in an attack on the Holocaust Museum here in Washington.  The attack on the museum is just the latest act of terrorism by so-called “lone wolves” of the far right. Two weeks ago, it was the murder of Dr. George Tiller.

Now, I guess I should acknowledge that Reverend Wright “issued a statement . . . that he was ‘disturbed and deeply saddened’ that his comments were stirring discussion again.”  He  apologized “‘for the way I framed my comments. I mis-spoke and I sincerely meant no harm or ill-will to the American Jewish community or the Obama administration.’”

Maybe the realization that the forces of evil are on the march again has put me in a bad frame of mind, but I’m not buying it. Reverend Wright is an anti-semite, and his rhetoric resembles that of von Brunn, the Holocaust Museum murderer.  Here’s a tidbit from a note found in von Brunn’s car, as reported by ABC News: “Obama was created by Jews. Obama does what his Jewish owners tell him to do.”  Sound familiar?

So, Reverend Wright, I am one Jew who is not inclined to accept your apology. And although I can’t speak for him, I suspect that your old friend, the President, wouldn’t mind me telling you to just shut the fuck up.

Tags: ,

Michelle Obama is an extraordinarily able person — bright, sensitive, politically savvy, and accomplished. She also has populist sensibilities and progressive political views that have made her a political and social force around the world. For these reasons, it is not surprising that buzz already has started about a possible run for the White House in 2020. I think this is ridiculous. She should run in 2016. If there’s one thing I have learned as the husband of a children’s education advocate, it’s the importance of continuity and stability for children. Malia and Sasha need the stability that 16 consecutive years in the White House would afford them. And heaven knows, we do, too. So let’s end this ridiculous talk of Michelle Obama running in 2020. Obama in 2016!

Tags: ,

Talked on the phone with my Mom tonight. She is 80-something and pretty much blind. She has been complaining that she is shrinking and nothing in her multiple closets of clothes fits her. My sister took her shopping yesterday — an experience that can best be compared to leading an ill-tempered Mr. Magoo through a China shop (with the pieces of China being played by small children and elderly people). Mom told me that she couldn’t find a thing to buy. Nothing fit her because of her ever-receding stature.

In a vain and stupid attempt to make her feel better, I said, “Huh. But your posture is still excellent.”

Mom: “What?”

Me, a bit louder: “Your posture is still excellent.”

Mom: “What?”  

Louder still : “But your posture is fine.” (My wife, who is in the next room, starts laughing.)

Mom: “What?”  

Me: Your posture’s fine, but your hearing isn’t so hot.”

Mom:  ”You were just speaking too softly.”

Here is a great toy for those parents who regret having had children too late to have to explain the Village People. As the packaging indicates, this is a toy for children ages 4 and up. (It can’t be marketed to children under four, because it has small parts — an issue I won’t address at this juncture.) Imagine the hours of fun explaining this toy to your four-year-old. Is it a policeman and a bloodied demonstrator, or something else entirely? Is this just your usual globalization action-figure toy set? Or is there something more going on?  And if this is not just a toy depicting the travails of late capitalism, what are we tell our four-year-olds?

Tags: ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »