Here are some tidbits from a visit to the National Mall in Washington, DC

No Surprise There

Today, I visited the National Mall in DC to see the Trump-Epstein statue. Here’s what I saw:

The Trump-Epstein statue wuz here

A local TV news reporter and cameraman who were standing around (seemingly looking for someone more interesting to talk to than me) said that although the permit for the statue was not supposed to expire until Sunday, Park Service officials removed the statue this morning. (It’s Wednesday.) The reporter kindly pointed out to me that someone marked the spot where the statue had been with the words “They got a room.”

The statue’s disappearance is less surprising than the fact that someone–presumably a soon-to-be ex-employee of the Park Service–approved the permit in the first place. The statue was a form of First Amendment expression, and this Administration has made it clear, through words, threats, and deeds, that the First Amendment no longer protects expression that displeases the bloated orange dictator.

So the Trump-Epstein statue is gone. Unfortunately, for the swelling pumpkin man, the Epstein drama is not going away as quickly and easily as the statue did.

Soldiers on the Mall

Having not seen what I figured I wouldn’t see, I walked around the mall. (The joys of retired life.) There, I saw groups of National Guard soldiers, armed with long guns–no doubt for protection against the hordes of vicious squirrels who hang out on the mall.

Make my day, Squirrel boy
Potentially vicious mall squirrel

We see groups of National Guard soldiers at random places around town.

Yesterday, I also saw a large group of FBI uniformed personnel gathering near one of the Gallery Place Metro entrances. (I am not sure what a group of FBI agents is called. Is it a “herd,” a “pride,” a “gaggle,” a “school,” a “flock,” a “murder”?) After a while, having apparently gotten their assignments, they headed out for some performative patrolling and harassing of the locals.

Finally, here’s what’s coming soon:

Trump to pave DC’s National Mall and bring in high-end retail; renaming also planned.

In an exciting development, President Trump is set to announce plans to pave the National Mall, bring in national chain stores, and rename the mall in honor of our “greatest President.”

According to Trump, “It’s supposed to be a mall, but there are no cell phone stores, no food courts, and no Macy’s, J.C. Penny’s or Nordstroms. You can’t even find an Auntie Ann’s pretzel shop! The ‘National Mall’ is dying. My executive order will turn this grass and dirt wasteland into the greatest mall in history. Many people have been asking me to do this. Everyone thinks this is a brilliant idea, and they all say that there is no one who could do it like I will. But people are begging me to make one other change. They say I should change the name because ‘National Mall’ is a terrible name. Nobody is going to come to shop at the ‘National Mall.’ So I asked them, what should I name it? I don’t want to name it after me, because so many great things already are named after me, but everyone is begging me to do just that. So we’re going to call it the ‘Trump National Mall.’ That has a nice to ring to it, doesn’t it? Very dignified. People will flock to it. We’ll move some of the memorials, which are very depressing and don’t belong in a mall. Then we’ll fill in the grass and dirt with very good concrete. It’ll be unlike anything anyone has ever seen.”

Tags: , , , , ,

Nothing that has happened recently has prompted the following thought, I assure you. So there’s nothing for anyone to get upset about. Really.

Anyway . . . . The following question just popped into my head, seemingly out of nowhere and not connected to anything that’s been happening lately.

Here it is: If it is hateful to quote the things that someone said, is that because the things that someone said were hateful?

Tags: , ,

As widely reported (for instance, here), Kamala Harris has admitted that she and other Democrats were “reckless[]” in deferring to President Biden about whether he should run for reelection. As she said in her new book, “The stakes were simply too high. This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision.”

I couldn’t agree more. The 2024 election was very likely the most consequential election for the future of the United States since the election of 1860 that brought Abraham Lincoln to the White House. And everyone knew it.

Yet Ms. Harris and other Democrats stood aside as Biden, his family, and his staff deluded themselves into thinking that, despite his obvious infirmities, he could win (and that he would be able to govern for another four years). It was not until the disastrous debate (and not even then, actually) that the Democrats realized that the house was on fire and something needed to be done. Even then, they dithered around for a while trying to figure out how to do what needed to be done, and then they landed on Ms. Harris, a weak candidate who was the logical choice because there wasn’t time for a real candidate selection process. Of course, we know the outcome.

Ms. Harris’ display of candor is nice (even though very late and seemingly contrived to sell copies of her book). But although her candor is admirable, it doesn’t offset the fact that she has admitted to grievous recklessness and incompetence in responding to the crisis that was Donald Trump’s 2024 candidacy. Such recklessness and incompetence should be disqualifying for any future electoral office. It’s time for her to go away.

Tags: , ,

In a bid to assure a Nobel Peace Prize, Trump plans to offer Vladimir Putin eastern Ukraine in exchange for Putin’s assurance that Russia will halt its attempts to annex the rest of Ukraine at least until 2029. According to unnamed White House officials, Trump’s advisors also have urged him to consider renouncing the United States’ claim to Alaska if the Russian leader balks at the eastern Ukraine offer. “If that’s what it takes to seal a deal (and win Trump a Nobel Peace Prize), it would be well worth it,” said one advisor. “We think Putin would definitely go for it, especially if he has to cease hostilities only until 2029 (when Trump supposedly will be out of office). And it won’t be hard to persuade Trump to make the offer. He already thinks Alaska is in Russia, so he won’t view it as a concession. The difficulty will be getting Trump to stop talking about White House redecorating plans.”

Tags: , , , ,

This is how it goes: With or without evidence (in this case, without), the dictator declares that escalating crime and disorder threaten public safety in the capital. Such rapidly deteriorating conditions require prompt and decisive action. On this pretext, he federalizes the capital’s local police force, brings in armed troops, and declares that he will take similar actions in other cities and regions, as necessary.

In the guise of preserving public order, he directs local officials to repeal laws that he does not like and to enact stiffer penalties for law breakers. Those local officials who protest or delay are removed from office, and citizens who dissent are dispersed through state-sanctioned violence.

Other institutions of the federal government fall into line, leaving no counterweights to the authority of the dictator and his subordinates. Members of the public are rounded up–initially as potential “illegal” aliens, but later as simply disloyal threats to public order. “Deviants” are identified and punished. Despite so-called constitutional protections, the dictator threatens to expel citizens who are insufficiently loyal.

Soon, the residents of the capital and other cities get used to seeing troops on their street corners, and stop remarking on, or even noticing, the sounds of mysterious low-flying helicopters surveilling their cities at night. Elections are suspended as too perilous in light of the ongoing public emergencies. Protests turn into whispered grumbles, and resignation descends upon the resentful but cowed citizens.

Tags: , ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »