Uncategorized

You are currently browsing the archive for the Uncategorized category.

This is another in my series on living in the incredible hell hole that is Washington, DC — a city in which you get murdered every day you venture out the door, or at least used to before King Donald stepped in to save the day. Now, he says, there is NO CRIME in DC.

Taking advantage of our now crime-free status, I went to a dental appointment downtown. I decided to see if I could improve the entire experience through exercises in “cognitive reframing” — changing the way I think about the experience.

It’s not that I hate visits to the dentist. Not at all. But I must admit a visit to the dentist simply doesn’t compare to, say, a colonoscopy.

Anyway, much to my surprise, I got to practice cognitive reframing as soon as I boarded the Metro to downtown DC. I left early because the DC Metro is, well, the DC Metro. I got to the station, saw the train was already there, and ran down the stairs, leaping aboard before the doors closed. But the doors didn’t close. Instead, we waited. With all the seats taken, I stood in the aisle. “This is fine,” I thought. “I will be sitting in the dentist’s chair for an hour or so. I don’t need to sit now.” Cognitive reframing.

Eventually, the train operator got on the intercom and explained that we were waiting for another train to come through a single-tracking zone. “Glad I left early. This will be fine,” I thought.

Moments later, a young man sitting in the seat adjacent to where I was standing asked me, “Sir, do you know how to tie a tie?” “Yes, I do,” I said. Because I do.

He took a tie out and held it up to me. “Could you show me?”

“Of course. Let’s get your jacket off first. It will be easier.” In the cramped seat, he struggled to take off his jacket, but the woman next to him helped. (It was pretty clear that she was not with him.) She then said, “I’ll take it,” and proceeded to fold the jacket neatly and put it in her lap.

I said, “I’m not too good at putting ties on other people, so I’ll show you how to do it.” (Teaching a man to fish is better than giving him a fish anyway, I thought.)

I then asked “Are you left-handed or right-handed?”

“Left-handed.”

“So am I,” I said. Because I am. “Let’s get this around your neck with the wider side here. I like to wrap the wider side twice around,” which I proceeded to do. “Then you loop the wider side under the knot and then through it,” which he and I did together. “Okay, then you pull down on the wider side to tighten the knot, and pull on the narrow side to raise the knot to your neck. Don’t pull it too high or you’ll choke.” We looked at the finished product, which frankly looked a lot better than what I usually do when I put on my own ties. I assessed the length, and he asked me how low it should go. “Around waist height, not covering your parts.”

As we helped him back on with his jacket and made sure the jacket collar was down and neat, I asked, “Job interview?”

“No, first day of work. On the Hill.”

“Awesome,” I said, “With the shutdown, this may be an easier time to start working up there. Less going on.” More cognitive reframing.

With that, we were done, the doors closed, and the train finally started to move. I resumed staring off into space, thinking that it was a lot easier to do this with the train stopped than it would have been if we were moving. Cognitive reframing.

At one point, I looked up from my reverie and a woman in a seat down the aisle made eye contact and put her hand up to her heart.

Yes, this is such a hell hole–this place we call home.

Tags: , , ,

I went to the White House to get a photograph of the destruction of the East Wing to make way for Trump’s gilded ballroom vanity project. I thought a photo would be useful for a blog post on the issue, if I chose to do one. (And apparently, I have chosen to do one.)

It was a beautiful DC fall day, and despite the fact that DC is a terrible hell hole, the trip to the White House was lovely. I passed people sitting on park benches and absolutely nobody murdered me.

Because of a carefully planned array of barriers and fencing, I could not get a good view of the destruction — I mean “project” — from the front (Pennsylvania Avenue side) of the White House. As I turned to walk away, two gentlemen asked me what I thought about the ballroom and whether I would participate in an interview. They explained that they were with The Bulwark, and one held a microphone. I agreed to the interview, and the man with the microphone asked me questions, while the other man filmed with his phone.

Filming an interview with a cellular telephone seemed pretty low-tech to me — a 67-year-old who is up on the latest cutting edge gadgets, doo-dads, and electronic wizardry that can be purchased at your local Radio Shack. But in hindsight, it was probably a good way not to attract the attention of the uniformed Secret Service officers who swarmed the area like a plague of locusts. (Of course, I would never compare our dedicated federal law enforcement to insects like locusts, roaches, or stinkbugs. That would be terribly unfair.)

Anyway, the interview seemed very nice. The man with the microphone asked thoughtful questions, and it being a free country and all (hahahahahahaha!), I spoke candidly in my typical somewhat Jewy Long Islander style.

I left after the interview, having been stymied in my attempt to photograph the historic destruction of the East Wing for a project that was designed to immortalize Trump’s reign and that was undertaken during a government shutdown while the commoners (particularly the most contemptible of commoners, federal workers) are facing job losses and rising prices for luxury goods such food, insurance, and everything else. I realized that I might be able to get a photo from the park (the “Ellipse”) at the rear of the White House, but I had lost the will to try. (The Administration is banking on ALL of us losing our will about EVERYTHING.)

A little digression here: The next day, I did go to the Ellipse, but the Secret Service suddenly chased everyone away and closed the Ellipse before I could get a look at the destruction. It is fair to assume that the Secret Service closed the Ellipse because the Orange King did not want the people or press to see what was actually happening. (I suppose that if he and his lackeys could have worked out the logistics of charging for admission to the Ellipse, Trump probably would have kept it open and given everyone no more than 3 minutes to take all the photos they wanted, at $5 a picture.)

Anyway, the interview with The Bulwark is on YouTube (with 235,000 views at this writing). I am the incredibly well-preserved guy in the blue sweatshirt. The YouTube video also includes excerpts of interviews with other people, and those people are articulate, well-informed, and politically insightful. You know, the kind of people this Administration hates.

Tags: , , , ,

I was on the way home from the gym the other day when a woman on a bicycle swerved by me to enter the driveway of a building that I was passing. She saw me jump out of her way, and she stopped her bicycle a few feet away from me and asked, “Did you smell that?” Not having smelled anything unusual–and not being stupid–I shook my head.

Apropos of nothing at that point, she declared that various women in the neighborhood have butt implants and those woman are stinky. She said that they smell like a combination of dank old person and poop. (She mentioned a few other smells in the combination, but all I remember is the old person and poop aspects of her narrative.)

I said that I was aware of the smell of pot throughout the neighborhood and asked her if that might be what she was talking about.

“No,” she said, “I am going to be honest with you. I smoke weed. Do I smell like weed?” She then held her hand to her nose and held it out to me, so I dutifully went over and smelled her hand. “No,” I said, “I don’t smell anything. Are you saying the butt implants smell?”

“I’m not sure,” she said, “but I think it’s the implants and the women not being able to wipe themselves because their butts are so big now. You know, bad hygiene.”

“Wow,” I said. “Thanks for telling me.”

“Have a blessed day,” she replied.

Tags:

As has been widely reported, on June 30, 2025, the Trump Administration froze about $6.8 billion in federal education funding that was scheduled to be released the very next day. The move created an immediate crisis for school districts–rural, suburban, and urban, rich and poor–across the country. Critical programs were threatened, including after-school programs, teacher training, migrant-education grants (which are actually not programs for “illegal immigrants”), and STEM programs. As a result of the freeze, schools were forced to plan layoffs and other cuts to compensate for the loss of previously-assured funding. A little less than a month later, the Administration decided to release the money.

The Administration’s decision to release the money, which should not have been withheld in the first place, is not an occasion for expressions of gratitude. Just as we don’t reward an arsonist who starts a fire and then pulls a fire alarm, so we should not applaud the Trump Administration for creating chaos and then restoring order.

As Steven Johnson, Superintendent of the Fort Ransom (N.D.) School District, told The Atlantic’s Toluse Olorunnipa, “After months of being told to ‘wait it out,’ districts are now supposed to pick up the pieces and act like everything’s fine.” Dr. Johnson went on to say, “I’ve got to be honest–this doesn’t sit well out here. You can’t freeze money that was already allocated, leave schools hanging through hiring season and budget planning, and then expect us to just be grateful when it finally shows up. Rural folks don’t like being jerked around.” (Olorunnipa’s article, by the way, is excellent, so if you have access to The Atlantic, it is well worth reading.)

Dr. Johnson’s observation points to a series of broader problems.

First, this Administration not only doesn’t worry about jerking us around but it thinks it has a right to do so if the dear leader enjoys it (which he does). That’s the way authoritarians roll: “I’ll do it because I can. And you’ll accept it because you must.” This means that Trump will keep jerking us around until we make it clear that he can’t get away with it.

Second, the Administration has consistently been hostile to education, which isn’t surprising for an Administration run by a demented sociopath who has contempt for science, reality, facts, and the ability to think.

And third, this Administration thrives on chaos and cruelty. It’s what Trump uses for oxygen.

What should give some of us hope is that people (including people who probably voted for Trump) are starting to push back. As Trump’s incompetence and chaotic management style cause more and more pain across the country, there is a pretty good chance that resistance to the Administration will grow. We’ll see what effects–if any–such resistance has on state and federal Republican office holders. But the gerrymandering efforts in Texas (and that are starting in other Republican strongholds) suggest that the Republicans know that the people are turning against them.

Tags: , , , , ,

Yesterday, numerous media outlets reported that a preliminary intelligence assessment found that the US bombing mission set Iran’s nuclear program back by only a “few months.” To the extent this preliminary assessment holds up (and isn’t suppressed or manipulated by the Trump Administration), its results are not surprising: bombing campaigns often don’t work as hoped. The bombing of Tora Bora failed to eliminate Bin Laden, and the sustained air campaign against the Ho Chi Minh trail during the Viet Nam war didn’t shut down that vital North Vietnamese supply line. These are just two examples that come to mind. There certainly are others.

Some of us are actually old enough to remember these events. But even if the responsible Administration officials don’t remember them, they should have learned about them. Perhaps it’s news to the Trump Administration, but one can learn about things that happened in the past–sometimes quaintly referred to as “history.” For instance you can learn about history from books, Podcasts, and the internet. There are TV shows about history.

Admittedly, it’s naive to suggest that Trump could learn anything (especially, hard stuff like history), but what about the people around him? Are they all just as cognitively limited as their dear leader?

The problem may not be the Administration’s collective cognitive (in)capacity. It may be a shared attitude–one that regards “history” as inherently suspect. After all, history purports to deal in facts, interpretations, and explanations. Facts, in particular, are problematic, because Trump prefers to believe his “gut” rather than, say, analyses prepared by intelligence services. And to survive in the Administration, his underlings probably have to ape Trump’s approach to decision-making.

In addition, an Administration that instinctively gaslights the public at every opportunity is unlikely to care about facts and other old-fashioned rationalist preoccupations like objectivity. (There’s been a startling reversal in attitudes toward objectivity in the decades since I was in college. Back then, it was the post-structuralist and deconstructionist lefties who pooh-poohed facts and objectivity. Today, it’s the ostensibly ring-wing MAGAs who proclaim that there are “alternative” facts or facts that are “my facts.”)

A little more respect for facts probably would not have made Trump hesitate about bombing Iran. Doing so was attention-getting and transgressive–two features that make an option impossible for Trump to resist. But a bit of knowledge about history might have spared Trump the unpleasant surprise he no doubt experienced upon hearing that the bombing sorties were not entirely successful.

Trump can take some solace from the fact that he isn’t the first President to be disappointed by a much-heralded bombing campaign. And, of course, he and his Administration have already begun attacking the assessment as fake news–in the words of Karoline Leavitt, Trump’s press secretary, its findings were “flat-out wrong.”

And it’s even possible that, as the analysts continue to pore over the evidence, the assessment may change (even without Trump Administration manipulation). That’s the nature of the search for truth: analyses, interpretations, and explanations may change as facts are discovered and reviewed.

But this has to sting, nonetheless. We can only hope that Trump can hold up in the face of this disappointment and the negative initial polling about the attack on Iran–a poll conducted before the news about the intelligence assessment. We wouldn’t want the guy to just up and quit, would we?

Tags: , , ,

« Older entries