Politics

You are currently browsing the archive for the Politics category.

I went to the White House to get a photograph of the destruction of the East Wing to make way for Trump’s gilded ballroom vanity project. I thought a photo would be useful for a blog post on the issue, if I chose to do one. (And apparently, I have chosen to do one.)

It was a beautiful DC fall day, and despite the fact that DC is a terrible hell hole, the trip to the White House was lovely. I passed people sitting on park benches and absolutely nobody murdered me.

Because of a carefully planned array of barriers and fencing, I could not get a good view of the destruction — I mean “project” — from the front (Pennsylvania Avenue side) of the White House. As I turned to walk away, two gentlemen asked me what I thought about the ballroom and whether I would participate in an interview. They explained that they were with The Bulwark, and one held a microphone. I agreed to the interview, and the man with the microphone asked me questions, while the other man filmed with his phone.

Filming an interview with a cellular telephone seemed pretty low-tech to me — a 67-year-old who is up on the latest cutting edge gadgets, doo-dads, and electronic wizardry that can be purchased at your local Radio Shack. But in hindsight, it was probably a good way not to attract the attention of the uniformed Secret Service officers who swarmed the area like a plague of locusts. (Of course, I would never compare our dedicated federal law enforcement to insects like locusts, roaches, or stinkbugs. That would be terribly unfair.)

Anyway, the interview seemed very nice. The man with the microphone asked thoughtful questions, and it being a free country and all (hahahahahahaha!), I spoke candidly in my typical somewhat Jewy Long Islander style.

I left after the interview, having been stymied in my attempt to photograph the historic destruction of the East Wing for a project that was designed to immortalize Trump’s reign and that was undertaken during a government shutdown while the commoners (particularly the most contemptible of commoners, federal workers) are facing job losses and rising prices for luxury goods such food, insurance, and everything else. I realized that I might be able to get a photo from the park (the “Ellipse”) at the rear of the White House, but I had lost the will to try. (The Administration is banking on ALL of us losing our will about EVERYTHING.)

A little digression here: The next day, I did go to the Ellipse, but the Secret Service suddenly chased everyone away and closed the Ellipse before I could get a look at the destruction. It is fair to assume that the Secret Service closed the Ellipse because the Orange King did not want the people or press to see what was actually happening. (I suppose that if he and his lackeys could have worked out the logistics of charging for admission to the Ellipse, Trump probably would have kept it open and given everyone no more than 3 minutes to take all the photos they wanted, at $5 a picture.)

Anyway, the interview with The Bulwark is on YouTube (with 235,000 views at this writing). I am the incredibly well-preserved guy in the blue sweatshirt. The YouTube video also includes excerpts of interviews with other people, and those people are articulate, well-informed, and politically insightful. You know, the kind of people this Administration hates.

Tags: , , , ,

Our dear orange leader did not win the Nobel Peace Prize today, but that’s only because made-up peace treaties and endless politicking for the award apparently don’t count for much with the committee that makes the selection. But if he looks at it with his usual restrained judgment, this cloud has several silver linings.

First, there’s always next year, and if the cease fire (or whatever it is) between Hamas and Israel holds (admittedly, a big if) the prize will be in the bag next year–assuming Trump doesn’t start any new wars and that he limits his extra-judicial executions of alleged drug runners in the Gulf of Whatever-It’s-Called. (Mr. Trump, please note that politically-motivated jailings or extra-judicial killings of domestic opponents here in the U.S. will earn serious demerits in the Nobel Committee’s future deliberations.)

Second, Trump can use the “snub” as more ammunition for his resentment, feelings of victimization, and all-around bottomless well of anger and paranoia. These feelings will no doubt be compounded by the fact that they gave the prize to a Venezualan woman! Besides their usefulness for uniting his base, these feelings almost certainly will make Trump feel good. So he has another year of that.

And third, this “snub” gives Trump grounds for reprisals against Norway. And for Trump, there’s nothing like some good revenge to get the blood flowing.

Tags: , ,

ICE Barbie and Noem’s he’s-not-my-boyfriend, Corey Lewandowski, are outraged that the NFL has invited Bad Bunny to perform at the Super Bowl. Bad Bunny has made no secret of the fact that he is not a fan of ICE and, even worse, he sings in Spanish. This is America, after all, and speaking any language other than English is a subversive insult perpetrated by left-wing radical Democrats.

Noem has asserted that ICE agents will be at the game, presumably to arrest all the undocumented immigrants who plan to throw down their huge wads of surplus disposable income on Super Bowl tickets. She also has darkly–and strangely–warned that the NFL “won’t be able to sleep at night.” Insomnia is a terrible thing, or so I’ve heard from the Washington Monument, the poetry of Robert Frost, and my refrigerator, which also can’t sleep at night.

The NFL is seeking to expand its audience internationally, and its marketers apparently believe that Bad Bunny–a wildly popular pop performer with a huge international audience–might entice new viewers. But MAGA thinks Creed–a rock act whose last hit was in 2002–would be a far better choice, and the fact that the NFL powers have a different view is simply unAmerican.

Private entities don’t have the right to do things that MAGA doesn’t like. The same goes for universities, broadcasters, non-profits, and everyone else. After all, this is a free country, which means that everyone is free to do what Trump and his lackeys demand.

The situation has made Ms. Noem and Mr. Lewandowski very angry, which probably makes them very happy (and maybe a little turned on). But of course, this anger is largely performative. For MAGA, anger is like oxygen. It feeds their perpetual sense of victimization, justifies expanded repression, and unites them around their orange cult leader. It also provides a convenient distraction from the Epstein files.

Tags: , ,

Here are some tidbits from a visit to the National Mall in Washington, DC

No Surprise There

Today, I visited the National Mall in DC to see the Trump-Epstein statue. Here’s what I saw:

The Trump-Epstein statue wuz here

A local TV news reporter and cameraman who were standing around (seemingly looking for someone more interesting to talk to than me) said that although the permit for the statue was not supposed to expire until Sunday, Park Service officials removed the statue this morning. (It’s Wednesday.) The reporter kindly pointed out to me that someone marked the spot where the statue had been with the words “They got a room.”

The statue’s disappearance is less surprising than the fact that someone–presumably a soon-to-be ex-employee of the Park Service–approved the permit in the first place. The statue was a form of First Amendment expression, and this Administration has made it clear, through words, threats, and deeds, that the First Amendment no longer protects expression that displeases the bloated orange dictator.

So the Trump-Epstein statue is gone. Unfortunately, for the swelling pumpkin man, the Epstein drama is not going away as quickly and easily as the statue did.

Soldiers on the Mall

Having not seen what I figured I wouldn’t see, I walked around the mall. (The joys of retired life.) There, I saw groups of National Guard soldiers, armed with long guns–no doubt for protection against the hordes of vicious squirrels who hang out on the mall.

Make my day, Squirrel boy
Potentially vicious mall squirrel

We see groups of National Guard soldiers at random places around town.

Yesterday, I also saw a large group of FBI uniformed personnel gathering near one of the Gallery Place Metro entrances. (I am not sure what a group of FBI agents is called. Is it a “herd,” a “pride,” a “gaggle,” a “school,” a “flock,” a “murder”?) After a while, having apparently gotten their assignments, they headed out for some performative patrolling and harassing of the locals.

Finally, here’s what’s coming soon:

Trump to pave DC’s National Mall and bring in high-end retail; renaming also planned.

In an exciting development, President Trump is set to announce plans to pave the National Mall, bring in national chain stores, and rename the mall in honor of our “greatest President.”

According to Trump, “It’s supposed to be a mall, but there are no cell phone stores, no food courts, and no Macy’s, J.C. Penny’s or Nordstroms. You can’t even find an Auntie Ann’s pretzel shop! The ‘National Mall’ is dying. My executive order will turn this grass and dirt wasteland into the greatest mall in history. Many people have been asking me to do this. Everyone thinks this is a brilliant idea, and they all say that there is no one who could do it like I will. But people are begging me to make one other change. They say I should change the name because ‘National Mall’ is a terrible name. Nobody is going to come to shop at the ‘National Mall.’ So I asked them, what should I name it? I don’t want to name it after me, because so many great things already are named after me, but everyone is begging me to do just that. So we’re going to call it the ‘Trump National Mall.’ That has a nice to ring to it, doesn’t it? Very dignified. People will flock to it. We’ll move some of the memorials, which are very depressing and don’t belong in a mall. Then we’ll fill in the grass and dirt with very good concrete. It’ll be unlike anything anyone has ever seen.”

Tags: , , , , ,

Nothing that has happened recently has prompted the following thought, I assure you. So there’s nothing for anyone to get upset about. Really.

Anyway . . . . The following question just popped into my head, seemingly out of nowhere and not connected to anything that’s been happening lately.

Here it is: If it is hateful to quote the things that someone said, is that because the things that someone said were hateful?

Tags: , ,

« Older entries